rating discuss
Contributed article

Flanders needs focus

Wim De Waele, CEO of the Flemish ICT research institute IBBT, argues for more focused innovation policies in Flanders

If Flanders seriously wants to boost the ICT sector, it is necessary to prioritise. To be able to raise its sights, a multi-year strategy needs to be developed and translated into policy and a concrete implementation plan. Research is an important component of such a policy, but the valorisation of that research is as important, if not more so, to set new dynamics in motion. To become a global player as a region you need to have an ecosystem anchored in knowledge and economic activity, but which always leaves space for new entrants.

Major social projects can be a guideline in stimulating economic sectors. Technology, for instance, still offers much potential for a broader approach to mobility problems, for example in relation to road pricing or integrating private and public transport. Likewise, the intensive introduction of technology in the health sector demands an integrated interdisciplinary approach. How, for example, should such technology be slotted into the chain of care providers, public authorities and patients? What about aspects such as security and privacy? Thus far the Flanders In Action programme has only pointed a way forward, but concrete translation into ambitious initiatives has been lacking.

A purely technology-driven approach is not a realistic proposition for a small region such as Flanders. Our added value is rather to be found in content. We must therefore capitalise on our strong points such as the creative industry, media and content. Focussing all-out on two sectors, after all, makes much more sense than giving limited support to five. Government subsidies should obviously not be the only mechanism in doing this. One must also create the right climate for launching initiatives, helping business cross the first thresholds and getting follow-up finance.
 
Companies such as TeleAtlas or Netlog show that we do have the required brains and creativity in Flanders. But without a structural solution for accumulating the necessary seed capital, it remains very difficult for entrepreneurs in the ICT sector to access that first investment. Venture capital funds seldom risk putting up pre-seed money. In the US this gap is filled by business angels who are much closer to the entrepreneurs and can therefore better assess market potential, but this is a rarity in our part of the world. And to develop real critical mass, for example by creating 10 businesses with a turnover of 100 million Euro, one needs to get at least 100 start-ups off the ground. That calls for money, in the pre-seed phase as well as later for the continued growth of these businesses. In itself it’s not even that much to create 10 successful businesses compared to the budgets that go to other sectors of our society, but in practice investments on this scale are unfortunately not made.
 
Apart from structural financing, however, we have a second big problem in Flanders: we do not have enough entrepreneurial spirit in our blood. And yet the key to success lies in conquering an international market. A strong sales and marketing mechanism is of vital importance in achieving this. Many market entrants therefore need the necessary guidance to enable them also to build up international contacts, approach funders, work out a thorough business plan and put together an interdisciplinary management team...
 
If we in Flanders do not want to lose touch with the ICT sector in the coming years we urgently need a consistent ICT innovation policy. Continuity and a long-term vision are definitely an important part of this. But let us not be too slow in looking over our borders either, and learning from best practices in other regions. In Portugal, for example, collaboration agreements have been entered into with a number of top American universities, and some of their typical entrepreneurial spirit has been channelled back to the home region, resulting in a complete change of attitude among the academics involved. But, above all, making well-considered, economically-oriented choices and achieving focus is what will make the difference. Creating new businesses and jobs should be at the centre of this.

Rating

Disagree
0
Agree
Poorly argued
0
Well argued
Irrelevant idea
0
Important idea
Rate this article
close You're not logged in. Please login here.
Not a member of the council yet? Become a member.

Share

Comments

You're not logged in. Please login here.
Not a member of the council yet? Become a member.

I believe a few things need to be put in place :

1) Guidance : as Wim correctly states. Starters can get guidance from lots of organisations (governmental or related), but it's very fragmented, very limited in time or focused. Starters need people who work with them for a longer period of time. And that costs money too.

2) Bring subsidies together. People who want to start a business get confused by all the sources they can financial help from and even more by the paperwork associated.

0 points

Website maintenance by Maxiware CC.

Hosted by Combell